AustraliaNSWCarlingfordJames Ruse Agricultural High School

James Ruse Agricultural High School

GovernmentSecondary7-12
Carlingford, NSW 2118 · Major Cities
jamesruse-h.school@det.nsw.edu.au 9871 7126
857Students
1222ICSEA
1:14Ratio
10/10SEIFA
James Ruse Agricultural

Socio-Educational Advantage — ICSEA

ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage) measures the socio-educational profile of this school's community — not the school itself. The national average is 1,000. It is calculated from parental occupation, parental education, geographic remoteness, and Indigenous enrolment proportion.

ICSEA Score1222
800 (most disadvantaged)Well above average1200 (most advantaged)
SEIFA IRSD Decile
10/10
least disadvantaged areas nationally
SEIFA IRSD Score
1109
Area-level index (ABS 2021)
ICSEA: ACARA (2025). SEIFA: ABS Census 2021.

Community Composition

With 80% of students from the top socio-educational quarter, James Ruse Agricultural High School draws from a markedly more advantaged community than the national average. This concentration at the top of the ICSEA distribution is reflected in its ICSEA score of 1222.

The chart below shows the proportion of students at James Ruse Agricultural High School from each socio-educational advantage quarter nationally. The white reference line marks 25% — the expected value if students were distributed evenly across quarters. Deviation from 25% in any quarter indicates a skewed community intake. The school draws predominantly from the top quarter.

Top quarter
+55pp above avg80%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Upper middle
-9pp below avg16%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Lower middle
-22pp below avg3%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Bottom quarter
-24pp below avg1%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Source: ACARA (2025). National average: 25% per quarter.

Why Community Composition Matters

ICSEA is not a quality ranking

ICSEA measures the community a school serves — not how well the school teaches. Two schools with identical ICSEA scores can have dramatically different teaching quality, culture, and outcomes. ICSEA is context, not verdict.

Always compare like with like

Comparing NAPLAN results between schools with different ICSEA scores is comparing communities, not schools. For meaningful comparison, look at schools within 30–40 points of each other on the ICSEA scale.

The composition shift over time

A school's community composition can shift significantly as a suburb gentrifies or a catchment area changes. A school that was below average in ICSEA a decade ago may now be serving a very different community — and vice versa.

SEIFA supplements ICSEA

SEIFA IRSD measures the geographic area around the school (from Census data). It provides a complementary view — especially useful for understanding schools in gentrifying or rapidly changing neighbourhoods where ICSEA may lag behind the on-the-ground reality.