AustraliaNSWCentral MangroveCentral Mangrove Public School

Central Mangrove Public School

GovernmentPrimaryK-6
Central Mangrove, NSW 2250 · Inner Regional
centmangro-p.school@det.nsw.edu.au 4373 1156
Students23enrolled
Ratio1:11.5student:teacher
SEIFA7/10advantage decile
Community Profile
886
ICSEA (-114 vs avg)
SEA Top ¼6%
SEA Bottom ¼71%
SEIFA Decile7/10
Indigenous22%
LBOTE17%
Central Mangrove Public

Socio-Educational Advantage — ICSEA

ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage) measures the socio-educational profile of this school's community — not the school itself. The national average is 1,000. It is calculated from parental occupation, parental education, geographic remoteness, and Indigenous enrolment proportion.

ICSEA Score886
800 (most disadvantaged)Well below average1200 (most advantaged)
SEIFA IRSD Decile
7/10
around the median nationally
SEIFA IRSD Score
1001
Area-level index (ABS 2021)
ICSEA: ACARA (2025). SEIFA: ABS Census 2021.

Community Composition

Central Mangrove Public School serves a significantly more disadvantaged community than average: 71% of students come from the bottom socio-educational quarter nationally. Understanding this context is essential when interpreting any outcome data for this school.

The chart below shows the proportion of students at Central Mangrove Public School from each socio-educational advantage quarter nationally. The white reference line marks 25% — the expected value if students were distributed evenly across quarters. Deviation from 25% in any quarter indicates a skewed community intake. The school draws predominantly from the bottom quarter.

Top quarter
-19pp below avg6%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Upper middle
-16pp below avg9%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Lower middle
-11pp below avg14%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Bottom quarter
+46pp above avg71%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Source: ACARA (2025). National average: 25% per quarter.

Why Community Composition Matters

ICSEA is not a quality ranking

ICSEA measures the community a school serves — not how well the school teaches. Two schools with identical ICSEA scores can have dramatically different teaching quality, culture, and outcomes. ICSEA is context, not verdict.

Always compare like with like

Comparing NAPLAN results between schools with different ICSEA scores is comparing communities, not schools. For meaningful comparison, look at schools within 30–40 points of each other on the ICSEA scale.

The composition shift over time

A school's community composition can shift significantly as a suburb gentrifies or a catchment area changes. A school that was below average in ICSEA a decade ago may now be serving a very different community — and vice versa.

SEIFA supplements ICSEA

SEIFA IRSD measures the geographic area around the school (from Census data). It provides a complementary view — especially useful for understanding schools in gentrifying or rapidly changing neighbourhoods where ICSEA may lag behind the on-the-ground reality.