AustraliaNSWLightning RidgeLightning Ridge Central School

Lightning Ridge Central School

GovernmentCombinedK-12
Lightning Ridge, NSW 2834 · Remote
lightningr-c.school@det.nsw.edu.au 6829 0511
Students311enrolled
Ratio1:9.6student:teacher
SEIFA1/10advantage decile
Community Profile
790
ICSEA (-210 vs avg)
SEA Top ¼4%
SEA Bottom ¼71%
SEIFA Decile1/10
Indigenous61%
LBOTE8%
Lightning Ridge Central

Socio-Educational Advantage — ICSEA

ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage) measures the socio-educational profile of this school's community — not the school itself. The national average is 1,000. It is calculated from parental occupation, parental education, geographic remoteness, and Indigenous enrolment proportion.

ICSEA Score790
800 (most disadvantaged)Well below average1200 (most advantaged)
SEIFA IRSD Decile
1/10
most disadvantaged areas nationally
SEIFA IRSD Score
875
Area-level index (ABS 2021)
ICSEA: ACARA (2025). SEIFA: ABS Census 2021.

Community Composition

Lightning Ridge Central School serves a significantly more disadvantaged community than average: 71% of students come from the bottom socio-educational quarter nationally. Understanding this context is essential when interpreting any outcome data for this school.

The chart below shows the proportion of students at Lightning Ridge Central School from each socio-educational advantage quarter nationally. The white reference line marks 25% — the expected value if students were distributed evenly across quarters. Deviation from 25% in any quarter indicates a skewed community intake. The school draws predominantly from the bottom quarter.

Top quarter
-21pp below avg4%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Upper middle
-16pp below avg9%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Lower middle
-9pp below avg16%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Bottom quarter
+46pp above avg71%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Source: ACARA (2025). National average: 25% per quarter.

Why Community Composition Matters

ICSEA is not a quality ranking

ICSEA measures the community a school serves — not how well the school teaches. Two schools with identical ICSEA scores can have dramatically different teaching quality, culture, and outcomes. ICSEA is context, not verdict.

Always compare like with like

Comparing NAPLAN results between schools with different ICSEA scores is comparing communities, not schools. For meaningful comparison, look at schools within 30–40 points of each other on the ICSEA scale.

The composition shift over time

A school's community composition can shift significantly as a suburb gentrifies or a catchment area changes. A school that was below average in ICSEA a decade ago may now be serving a very different community — and vice versa.

SEIFA supplements ICSEA

SEIFA IRSD measures the geographic area around the school (from Census data). It provides a complementary view — especially useful for understanding schools in gentrifying or rapidly changing neighbourhoods where ICSEA may lag behind the on-the-ground reality.