AustraliaNSWMount DruittChifley College Senior Campus

Chifley College Senior Campus

GovernmentSecondary11-12
Mount Druitt, NSW 2770 · Major Cities
chifcolsnr-h.school@det.nsw.edu.au 9625 9920
Students499enrolled
Ratio1:9.2student:teacher
SEIFA1/10advantage decile
Community Profile
894
ICSEA (-106 vs avg)
SEA Top ¼2%
SEA Bottom ¼67%
SEIFA Decile1/10
Indigenous23%
LBOTE47%
Chifley

Socio-Educational Advantage — ICSEA

ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage) measures the socio-educational profile of this school's community — not the school itself. The national average is 1,000. It is calculated from parental occupation, parental education, geographic remoteness, and Indigenous enrolment proportion.

ICSEA Score894
800 (most disadvantaged)Well below average1200 (most advantaged)
SEIFA IRSD Decile
1/10
most disadvantaged areas nationally
SEIFA IRSD Score
864
Area-level index (ABS 2021)
ICSEA: ACARA (2025). SEIFA: ABS Census 2021.

Community Composition

Chifley College Senior Campus serves a significantly more disadvantaged community than average: 67% of students come from the bottom socio-educational quarter nationally. Understanding this context is essential when interpreting any outcome data for this school.

The chart below shows the proportion of students at Chifley College Senior Campus from each socio-educational advantage quarter nationally. The white reference line marks 25% — the expected value if students were distributed evenly across quarters. Deviation from 25% in any quarter indicates a skewed community intake. The school draws predominantly from the bottom quarter.

Top quarter
-23pp below avg2%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Upper middle
-17pp below avg8%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Lower middle
-3pp below avg22%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Bottom quarter
+42pp above avg67%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Source: ACARA (2025). National average: 25% per quarter.

Why Community Composition Matters

ICSEA is not a quality ranking

ICSEA measures the community a school serves — not how well the school teaches. Two schools with identical ICSEA scores can have dramatically different teaching quality, culture, and outcomes. ICSEA is context, not verdict.

Always compare like with like

Comparing NAPLAN results between schools with different ICSEA scores is comparing communities, not schools. For meaningful comparison, look at schools within 30–40 points of each other on the ICSEA scale.

The composition shift over time

A school's community composition can shift significantly as a suburb gentrifies or a catchment area changes. A school that was below average in ICSEA a decade ago may now be serving a very different community — and vice versa.

SEIFA supplements ICSEA

SEIFA IRSD measures the geographic area around the school (from Census data). It provides a complementary view — especially useful for understanding schools in gentrifying or rapidly changing neighbourhoods where ICSEA may lag behind the on-the-ground reality.