AustraliaNSWRaymond TerraceIrrawang High School

Irrawang High School

GovernmentSecondary7-12
Raymond Terrace, NSW 2324 · Major Cities
irrawang-h.school@det.nsw.edu.au 4987 4687
Students810enrolled
Ratio1:10.4student:teacher
SEIFA1/10advantage decile
Community Profile
916
ICSEA (-84 vs avg)
SEA Top ¼3%
SEA Bottom ¼57%
SEIFA Decile1/10
Indigenous24%
LBOTE5%
Irrawang

Socio-Educational Advantage — ICSEA

ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage) measures the socio-educational profile of this school's community — not the school itself. The national average is 1,000. It is calculated from parental occupation, parental education, geographic remoteness, and Indigenous enrolment proportion.

ICSEA Score916
800 (most disadvantaged)Below average1200 (most advantaged)
SEIFA IRSD Decile
1/10
most disadvantaged areas nationally
SEIFA IRSD Score
885
Area-level index (ABS 2021)
ICSEA: ACARA (2025). SEIFA: ABS Census 2021.

Community Composition

Irrawang High School serves a significantly more disadvantaged community than average: 57% of students come from the bottom socio-educational quarter nationally. Understanding this context is essential when interpreting any outcome data for this school.

The chart below shows the proportion of students at Irrawang High School from each socio-educational advantage quarter nationally. The white reference line marks 25% — the expected value if students were distributed evenly across quarters. Deviation from 25% in any quarter indicates a skewed community intake. The school draws predominantly from the bottom quarter.

Top quarter
-22pp below avg3%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Upper middle
-12pp below avg13%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Lower middle
+2pp above avg27%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Bottom quarter
+32pp above avg57%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Source: ACARA (2025). National average: 25% per quarter.

Why Community Composition Matters

ICSEA is not a quality ranking

ICSEA measures the community a school serves — not how well the school teaches. Two schools with identical ICSEA scores can have dramatically different teaching quality, culture, and outcomes. ICSEA is context, not verdict.

Always compare like with like

Comparing NAPLAN results between schools with different ICSEA scores is comparing communities, not schools. For meaningful comparison, look at schools within 30–40 points of each other on the ICSEA scale.

The composition shift over time

A school's community composition can shift significantly as a suburb gentrifies or a catchment area changes. A school that was below average in ICSEA a decade ago may now be serving a very different community — and vice versa.

SEIFA supplements ICSEA

SEIFA IRSD measures the geographic area around the school (from Census data). It provides a complementary view — especially useful for understanding schools in gentrifying or rapidly changing neighbourhoods where ICSEA may lag behind the on-the-ground reality.