AustraliaNSWSawtellWilliam Bayldon Public School

William Bayldon Public School

GovernmentPrimaryK-6
Sawtell, NSW 2452 · Inner Regional
bayldon-p.school@det.nsw.edu.au 6658 2676
Students159enrolled
Ratio1:9.1student:teacher
SEIFA3/10advantage decile
Community Profile
812
ICSEA (-188 vs avg)
SEA Top ¼4%
SEA Bottom ¼78%
SEIFA Decile3/10
Indigenous54%
LBOTE5%
William Bayldon Public

Socio-Educational Advantage — ICSEA

ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage) measures the socio-educational profile of this school's community — not the school itself. The national average is 1,000. It is calculated from parental occupation, parental education, geographic remoteness, and Indigenous enrolment proportion.

ICSEA Score812
800 (most disadvantaged)Well below average1200 (most advantaged)
SEIFA IRSD Decile
3/10
most disadvantaged areas nationally
SEIFA IRSD Score
927
Area-level index (ABS 2021)
ICSEA: ACARA (2025). SEIFA: ABS Census 2021.

Community Composition

William Bayldon Public School serves a significantly more disadvantaged community than average: 78% of students come from the bottom socio-educational quarter nationally. Understanding this context is essential when interpreting any outcome data for this school.

The chart below shows the proportion of students at William Bayldon Public School from each socio-educational advantage quarter nationally. The white reference line marks 25% — the expected value if students were distributed evenly across quarters. Deviation from 25% in any quarter indicates a skewed community intake. The school draws predominantly from the bottom quarter.

Top quarter
-21pp below avg4%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Upper middle
-21pp below avg4%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Lower middle
-11pp below avg14%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Bottom quarter
+53pp above avg78%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Source: ACARA (2025). National average: 25% per quarter.

Why Community Composition Matters

ICSEA is not a quality ranking

ICSEA measures the community a school serves — not how well the school teaches. Two schools with identical ICSEA scores can have dramatically different teaching quality, culture, and outcomes. ICSEA is context, not verdict.

Always compare like with like

Comparing NAPLAN results between schools with different ICSEA scores is comparing communities, not schools. For meaningful comparison, look at schools within 30–40 points of each other on the ICSEA scale.

The composition shift over time

A school's community composition can shift significantly as a suburb gentrifies or a catchment area changes. A school that was below average in ICSEA a decade ago may now be serving a very different community — and vice versa.

SEIFA supplements ICSEA

SEIFA IRSD measures the geographic area around the school (from Census data). It provides a complementary view — especially useful for understanding schools in gentrifying or rapidly changing neighbourhoods where ICSEA may lag behind the on-the-ground reality.