AustraliaQLDMount MolloyMount Molloy State School

Mount Molloy State School

GovernmentPrimaryPrep-6
Mount Molloy, QLD 4871 · Outer Regional
Students37enrolled
Ratio1:12.3student:teacher
SEIFA1/10advantage decile
Community Profile
923
ICSEA (-77 vs avg)
SEA Top ¼11%
SEA Bottom ¼43%
SEIFA Decile1/10
Indigenous27%
LBOTE28%
Mount Molloy State

Socio-Educational Advantage — ICSEA

ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage) measures the socio-educational profile of this school's community — not the school itself. The national average is 1,000. It is calculated from parental occupation, parental education, geographic remoteness, and Indigenous enrolment proportion.

ICSEA Score923
800 (most disadvantaged)Below average1200 (most advantaged)
SEIFA IRSD Decile
1/10
most disadvantaged areas nationally
SEIFA IRSD Score
883
Area-level index (ABS 2021)
ICSEA: ACARA (2025). SEIFA: ABS Census 2021.

Community Composition

Mount Molloy State School serves a significantly more disadvantaged community than average: 43% of students come from the bottom socio-educational quarter nationally. Understanding this context is essential when interpreting any outcome data for this school.

The chart below shows the proportion of students at Mount Molloy State School from each socio-educational advantage quarter nationally. The white reference line marks 25% — the expected value if students were distributed evenly across quarters. Deviation from 25% in any quarter indicates a skewed community intake. The school draws predominantly from the bottom quarter.

Top quarter
-14pp below avg11%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Upper middle
-12pp below avg13%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Lower middle
+9pp above avg34%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Bottom quarter
+18pp above avg43%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Source: ACARA (2025). National average: 25% per quarter.

Why Community Composition Matters

ICSEA is not a quality ranking

ICSEA measures the community a school serves — not how well the school teaches. Two schools with identical ICSEA scores can have dramatically different teaching quality, culture, and outcomes. ICSEA is context, not verdict.

Always compare like with like

Comparing NAPLAN results between schools with different ICSEA scores is comparing communities, not schools. For meaningful comparison, look at schools within 30–40 points of each other on the ICSEA scale.

The composition shift over time

A school's community composition can shift significantly as a suburb gentrifies or a catchment area changes. A school that was below average in ICSEA a decade ago may now be serving a very different community — and vice versa.

SEIFA supplements ICSEA

SEIFA IRSD measures the geographic area around the school (from Census data). It provides a complementary view — especially useful for understanding schools in gentrifying or rapidly changing neighbourhoods where ICSEA may lag behind the on-the-ground reality.