AustraliaVICCaulfield NorthCaulfield Junior College

Caulfield Junior College

GovernmentPrimaryPrep-6
Caulfield North, VIC 3161 · Major Cities
03 9509 6872
Students536enrolled
Ratio1:14.1student:teacher
SEIFA10/10advantage decile
Community Profile
1160
ICSEA (+160 vs avg)
SEA Top ¼67%
SEA Bottom ¼1%
SEIFA Decile10/10
Indigenous1%
LBOTE81%
Caulfield Junior

Socio-Educational Advantage — ICSEA

ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage) measures the socio-educational profile of this school's community — not the school itself. The national average is 1,000. It is calculated from parental occupation, parental education, geographic remoteness, and Indigenous enrolment proportion.

ICSEA Score1160
800 (most disadvantaged)Well above average1200 (most advantaged)
SEIFA IRSD Decile
10/10
least disadvantaged areas nationally
SEIFA IRSD Score
1158
Area-level index (ABS 2021)
ICSEA: ACARA (2025). SEIFA: ABS Census 2021.

Community Composition

With 67% of students from the top socio-educational quarter, Caulfield Junior College draws from a markedly more advantaged community than the national average. This concentration at the top of the ICSEA distribution is reflected in its ICSEA score of 1160.

The chart below shows the proportion of students at Caulfield Junior College from each socio-educational advantage quarter nationally. The white reference line marks 25% — the expected value if students were distributed evenly across quarters. Deviation from 25% in any quarter indicates a skewed community intake. The school draws predominantly from the top quarter.

Top quarter
+42pp above avg67%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Upper middle
+1pp above avg26%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Lower middle
-18pp below avg7%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Bottom quarter
-24pp below avg1%
National average: 25% in each quarter
Source: ACARA (2025). National average: 25% per quarter.

Why Community Composition Matters

ICSEA is not a quality ranking

ICSEA measures the community a school serves — not how well the school teaches. Two schools with identical ICSEA scores can have dramatically different teaching quality, culture, and outcomes. ICSEA is context, not verdict.

Always compare like with like

Comparing NAPLAN results between schools with different ICSEA scores is comparing communities, not schools. For meaningful comparison, look at schools within 30–40 points of each other on the ICSEA scale.

The composition shift over time

A school's community composition can shift significantly as a suburb gentrifies or a catchment area changes. A school that was below average in ICSEA a decade ago may now be serving a very different community — and vice versa.

SEIFA supplements ICSEA

SEIFA IRSD measures the geographic area around the school (from Census data). It provides a complementary view — especially useful for understanding schools in gentrifying or rapidly changing neighbourhoods where ICSEA may lag behind the on-the-ground reality.