AustraliaWAComoComo Secondary College

Como Secondary College

GovernmentSecondary7-12
Como, WA 6152 · Major Cities
838enrolled
Ratio1:13.3student:teacher
9/10advantage decile
Community Profile
1056
ICSEA (+56 vs avg)
SEA Top ¼31%
SEA Bottom ¼17%
SEIFA Decile9/10
Indigenous7%
LBOTE48%
Como

ICSEA Socio-Educational Advantage

ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage) measures the socio-educational profile of this school's community not the school itself.The national average is 1,000.It is calculated from parent's occupation, parent's education, geographic remoteness, and Indigenous enrolment proportion.The national average is 1,000.It is calculated from parent's occupation, parent's education, geographic remoteness, and Indigenous enrolment proportion.

ICSEA Score1056
800 (most disadvantaged)Above average1200 (most advantaged) (most favored)
SEIFA IRSD Decile
9/10
least disadvantaged areas nationally
SEIFA IRSD Score
1104
Area-level index (ABS 2021)
ICSEA: ACARA (2025). SEIFA: ABS Census 2021.

Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition Community Composition

Como Secondary College's community composition is broadly balanced across socio-educational quarters, reflecting a relatively diverse intake compared to many Australian schools

️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️ Como Secondary College upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half upper half

Top quarter Top quarter
6 pp above avg31%
25% en cada trimestre
Upper middle
5 pp above avg30%
25% en cada trimestre
Below middleBelow middleBelow middle
3 pp below avg22%
25% en cada trimestre
Bottom quarter
8 pp below avg17%
25% en cada trimestre
2025

Community Composition Matters Why

ICSEA is not a quality ranking

ICSEA measures the community a school serves not how well the school teaches. Two schools with identical ICSEA scores can have dramatically different teaching quality, culture, and outcomes. ICSEA is context, not verdict.

Sempre compare like with like

️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️

The composition shift over time

️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️

SEIFA complements ICSEA

Seifa IRSD measures the geographic area around the school (from Census data). It provides a complementary view especially useful for understanding schools in gentrifying or rapidly changing neighborhoods where ICSEA may lag behind the on-the-ground reality